Whatever happened to "Security"?

"The word 'security' appears in the title because the BNP believes in the sanctity of life, limb and property. This means safe neighbourhoods with vibrant, cohesive communities; it means security of long-term employment, devoid of the fear that industry, commerce and employment will be transferred to the Third World."

The foregoing passage comes from a statement, in Mr Griffin's name, on the page entitled Manifesto, (click on the Policies link on the Home page) on the main web site of the British National Party, http://www.bnp.org.uk/. 

The trouble is that, contrary to the tenor of the statement and as readers may see for themselves at a glance, the word security does not appear in the title of the party's 2010 manifesto. "Security" has been replaced by the word culture.

Not only does this solecism smack of amateurishness, but, more worryingly still, it may have a sinister connotation, suggesting an insidious drift towards cultural nationalism, at the expense of the party's ethnonationalist principles.  The use of the word vibrant, so beloved of the cheerleaders of the multicult, similarly, is anything but reassuring, as is the absence of any explicit reference, in the statement quoted above in connection with security, to the need for strong armed forces and strong police and border protection forces.

The manifesto's sub-title would appear to indicate that the BNP was expecting more than one general election to have been held in 2010.  While this may denote a remarkable prescience, I would suggest that it is more likely to have been an unfortunate misprint.

We have already seen Mr Griffin's misguided determination, at any cost to the morale of activists, to foist an ethnically alien immigrant onto the BNP, in the prominent role of the party's Candidate for Mayor of London: an electorally disastrous move.

It is hardly surprising that such an immigrant should seek to subvert the party's espousal of ethnonationalism as its political philosophy, in the illusory hope of strengthening the tenuous legitimacy of their personal position within our party.  Were they to be engaged in politics in their land of ethnic origin, however, their attitude to the question of ethnically alien immigrants taking plum jobs, which should have gone to better qualified and more suitable indigenous folk, would no doubt be very different.

This is an illustration both of the kind of hypocrisy to which ethnically alien immigration typically gives rise and of the 'Griffin cringe' towards the rotten Establishment that is robbing our English people of their birthright, that we saw him perform so abjectly on Question Time two years ago.