Mass immigration the root of the problem - not Islam

Acknowledgements to the BNP Reform 2011 web site where this excellent article was first published.

Tin Tabernacles

By Polemics, on March 19th, 2011

Nick Griffin has failed to provide leadership to a people being race-replaced.

February’s issue of “British Nationalist” the British National Party’s monthly members’ bulletin carried a short article about a new leafleting campaign. The Party is focussing on two issues:

NO MORE MOSQUES

No More Mosques has a very EDL ring to it. That’s probably why it induces a sense of ennui. Is it really these places of worship which are the cause of our discomfort and misgivings? Would we all breathe a collective sigh of relief if these foreigners were demanding Methodist Tabernacles or Buddhist Temples? Is this honestly at root a religious issue? Or are we cowardly protesting the proximate cause of our anxiety, when the ultimate concern is the presence of many millions of foreigners in our country without our express consent.

This soft option of invoking religion as the cause and therefore by extension the cure for this demographic disaster has the (unintended consequence?) effect of destroying our hitherto comfortably secular society; a society which evolved over hundreds of years and through almost unimaginable bloodshed. At a stroke our country has been plunged back into the 16th Century.

FAIR HOUSING

What is fair about asking the British to house anyone who is not British? We are not responsible for the rest of the world and his dog. Fairness is a concept endogenous to ourselves and in the absence of reciprocity should not be extended to others. The inconvenient truth is the peaking of North Sea oil and gas over ten years ago and our reliance on imported energy and food means we simply cannot support an estimated population of 70m. There is nothing fair about the laws of physics.

At this late stage the Party’s anodyne, populist and mealy-mouthed appeals to a people being race-replaced is a stunning indictment of Nick Griffin’s failure to address the prevailing terms of debate: the public discourse. From day one he has internalised the language of our opponents.”Fair Housing” is a good example. It is implicit that the use of the, for us, loaded word “fair” – a word which keys into our emotions – actually results in our being manipulated by language into accepting something which is profoundly unfair, i.e. make some sort of provision, if only in terms of putting people to the back of the queue; nonetheless, we are being “fair” because we accept them into a queue. What is fair about placing hapless interlopers, who have been invited into our country without our express consent, at the back of any of our queues? Answer. Nothing. We owe foreigners nothing. There is no moral imperative to provide for anyone but ourselves. If you are unsure of the morality of that statement open your eyes. Or if you don’t believe your lying eyes wait for the 2011 Census data to be made available.

Nationalists have failed to grapple with what really holds us back: discourse. The discourse as manufactured and controlled by the mainstream is like a net thrown over us. By repudiating their terms of debate at the outset we avoid the net.

Nick Griffin cannot provide the leadership our people so desperately need. He has had total control of the Party’s propaganda for over a decade. He has made no impact on the terms of reference of public discourse. Do not believe the anti-Reform spin that we are sellouts. No, the real sellout is the Chairman himself.

.