Send the griffin away with its tail between its legs

Agenda for General Members Meeting of the British National Party on Sunday, 26 June 2011

Three motions of constitutional 'reform' are proposed by NJ Griffin Esq, National Chairman.

Motion # 1                              Recommendation: REJECT

Motion # 2                              Recommendation: REJECT

Motion # 3                              Recommendation: REJECT

Any other motion/
amendment, with            Recommendation: REJECT
the sole exception
of a motion of

NO CONFIDENCE
IN THE NATIONAL
CHAIRMAN                          Recommendation: ACCEPT

The only thing Griffin really wants and I do mean REALLY wants, out of the meeting next Sunday is a four year term of office for HIMSELF as national chairman of the BNP.

All else, his disingenuous protestations and no doubt a few crocodile tears notwithstanding, is mere window-dressing.

Griffin NEEDS a four year term in order to insure himself against the impending Apocalypse which is due to strike both himself and the party later in the year. That way when things turn belly up he can say to the BNP's dwindling membership "You have to take the rough with the smooth. Don't forget you voted me in for four years".

Don't be taken in by the argument put forward by last year's challenger, who sadly seems to have lost the plot, to the effect that voting up Motion # 1 would at least ensure that a leadership election takes place, because of the removal of the excessively high nominations hurdle from the process.

It would ensure no such thing. If one thing has been learnt over the last twelve months it is that Griffin's word means nothing. His word means nothing to him and should mean less than nothing to anyone who knows the nature of the beast.

A constitution cannot restrain a malignant tyrant (which is what Griffin is, on a modest enough scale as tyrants go, certainly, but a tyrant nonetheless) when that tyrant is solely responsible for implementing that constitution and believes he may choose to flout any of its provisions with impunity.

No, the Griffin-bait of a putatively free and fair election, without the requirement to collect hundreds of nominations, supposedly without being allowed to canvass for them, is a delusion and a snare for the unwary. Does anyone really believe that once Griffin had got what he wanted, a vote in favour of a four year term, he would honour his side of the deal and allow his challenger(s) a fair contest? Why should he do so? Because honour demands that he should? Don't be absurd. This creature, this malignant freak, Griffin, has demonstrated over and over again, time after time, that he, along with his inner circle of perverted 'friends' and advisers, is utterly without honour: a cheat, a liar, a coward, a scoundrel of the deepest dye.

There is only one way to treat such dross as Griffin is and that is with the contempt that he so richly deserves. Vote down any and all motions and amendments to which he gives his endorsement as a honey-trap and vote up an emergency motion of No Confidence in the National Chairman.