The big lie

BNP Head Office’s Misleading Claim over Royal Mail Bill Exposed

Posted by admin, on 20 July, 2011, to Andrew Brons' BNP Ideas web site // 3 Comments

The outstanding Royal Mail bill for £57,000 is directly owed by the British National Party and not by a company called “Solasni” as falsely claimed in the “mythbusters” circular recently sent out to all party members by BNP head office.



Copies of the original mailing dockets obtained by BNP Ideas.com show very clearly that the Royal Mail Printed Postage Impressions (PPI) dockets, which form the basis of the creditor’s lawsuit against the BNP, are made out in the name of the party and not “Solasni.”

The “Solasni” connection is merely a post office box which was temporarily used as a correspondence address, and that company has no contract with Royal Mail, nor is it liable for the BNP’s debt with Royal Mail.

In the “mythbusters” circular, printed and mailed out to all members with the latest party bulletin, it was claimed that the £57,000 (which is already the subject of court proceedings) was “billed to a company called Solasni.”

This is blatantly untrue, as the Royal Mail Dockets – signed by Angus Matthys, Nick Griffin’s son-in-law, clearly show.






The dockets which were used to mail out the party's circulars have been in the party’s name for so long that they actually contain the office address of the party’s then treasurer, John Walker, from 2007 – years before the Belfast office was even opened.

It is a scandal that party members’ money has been misused to print and mail out this factional misinformation to the members.

This news, coming so soon after the revelation that a judgement had already been given in the Romac court case against the party, despite the “mythbusters” claim that no such action was even under way, will serve as a further blow to the credibility of any reports emanating from the party’s head office.

It is little short of astounding that the party head office could claim in the “mythbusters” circular that the BNP is not liable for the Royal Mail debts, or that the court action is against a third party.

Below, the Royal Mail PPI dockets, which show the account holder’s name, the address, and even the signature of Angus Matthys from BNP head office.

Tags: BNP Debts, Royal Mail debts
3 Responses to " BNP Head Office’s Misleading Claim over Royal Mail Bill Exposed "
S says:
July 20, 2011 at 9:13 pm
Where can we get a copy of the “mythbusters” document?

http://www.bnp.org.uk/PDF/MythBusters.pdf

Reply
Martin J says:
July 20, 2011 at 10:51 pm
GOOD luck in the election Andrew, when are the results announced?

Reply
John says:
July 20, 2011 at 11:55 pm
The revelations get worse and worse.

It is outrageous that the leadership should deceive those who pay their wages, ie their own members, as this website has revealed. Who do they think they are? Do they believe that we exist to serve them?

The head of the Met has just resigned, not because of wrong doing but because of the wrong doing of another, he appointed.

In our party, we have wrong doing after wrong doing, lies after lies, misrepresentation after misrepresentation, deceit and wheeling and dealing.

In addition we have huge debts, the collapse of the activist base and the rapid decline in membership, the collapse of our vote and the loss of our councillors.

We also have a history of unpopular appointments in recent years, who have caused division.

How many resignations have we had from the leadership? How many offers of resignation from the Chairman? NONE.

Clearly, these people do not understand that upright Brits resign when they fail.

Worse, they want to cling on because most of them have a vested interest: money, which we pay in our donations and membership subs.

How many family members, incidentally, has NG employed working for the party?

Another thing: who manages the accounts for the Trafalgar Club? It is time there was a light into its finances and where they are spent and how and by whom and on what.

Once Andrew Brons is elected, so long as there is no fixing of the votes, we need a full enquiry into these many issues.

Given the lies, those who have been involved in such dishonesty must be placed on disciplinary charges and, if necessary, expelled whoever they might be.